We've just returned from seeing One Man Star Wars Trilogy with Charles Ross (he also does the One Man Lord of the Rings, which he's currently not allowed to tour in the UK, presumably due to the musical). The warm up at the start of the show was a guy called Matthew Reed, he was amusing enough and raised a few chuckles. He wasn't laugh out loud funny though. His stint was about 20 minutes, and then a break of about 15 minutes (we'd only just settled in!)... and the main event.
We didn't know what to expect... Well, we did... we expected One Man Star Wars (the clue is in the title). What we didn't know was, frankly, if it'd be much cop. We were pleasantly surprised. He does each of the three films in the original trilogy (not the prequels) in 20 minutes each, with most of the major plot points present. There are even the opening lion's roar and the scrolling text (okay, you have to imagine the actual text).
I won't recount the details, as if you've seen the films, you know the plot. As we left I overheard one woman saying 'I didn't really know what was happening'. Unsurprising, you're not going to understand the parody without at least some familiarity with the thing being parodied!
His rendition is hilarious. C3P0 was very well done, and Luke was uniformly presented as whiny, which hit the nail on the head. Not every word uttered was directly from the film (Luke's last line of 'Jedi' was very amusing, as was Han's reaction to Leia's revelation at the end of 'Jedi').
Chewbacca's reaction at the medal ceremony at the end of 'A New Hope' was very funny, and echoed what I've thought each time I've seen that scene.
Yoda was very well observed, the physicality with Yoda's (imaginary) cane was spot on.
For me, the best parts were the appearance of some of the minor characters. The thug in the bar who abuses Luke ('He doesn't like you..... I don't like you either') was very well done. Admiral Ackbar was good too, and reminded me of Columbo.
The battle to blow up the Death Star, with the visual representation of the various ships was good - we could instantly distinguish an X-wing from a Y-wing from a Tie Fighter.
A good night out, but it's not one for those rare people who aren't familiar with the films. The show is touring in the UK until mid-July. For one night at each venue it will visit Kings Lynn, Canterbury, Bradford, Newcastle, Nottingham, Northampton, Cardiff, Leicester, Cheltenham, Lichfield, Salford, Reading, Poole, London (for 7 nights), Durham and Lincoln. It ends its tour in Lincoln on the 12th July.
Oh, one thing.... there are StormTroopers at the Theatre. If you want a photo, go early and bring a camera. I didn't have mine.
I was just flicking through 'Empire' (Oct 2006) and ... how can I put this? Han shoots first!
Contrary to what was said a few years back (that the original cuts of 'Star Wars' no longer exist), on the 11th next month there will be a new release of the films on DVD (Ep 4, 5, and 6).
Each film will be a two disc set, the first disc will be the new and 'improved' versions. These are the versions with the mismatched special effects, redundant scenes with Jabba, daft numbers of Storm Troopers and Greedo getting what's coming to him.
The second disc, the 'bonus' disc, will be the original versions, unaltered, dated but consistant special effects, Jabba saved for later, no batallion of storm troopers in the corridor for Han to run into, and Greedo being pre-empted by a smuggler.
I think they may have got the numbering of the discs back to front, as far as I'm concerned the 'bonus' is the only reason to get this.
I'm not at all impressed with all the reissues and upgrades, it got 'over fussy', and the mix of technologies used in making the 'upgrade' felt patchy.
However, the original films on DVD.... tempting.
The RRP of the discs is a touch under 23 quid each. A little on the steep side, especially when all I'd want is the 'bonus' disc. Unfortunately it'll be a letterbox edition and not an anamorphic version (i.e. better quality). Maybe that's for a later release (based on past evidence, not an unreasonable assumption).
As for the future I'm not in any great rush to go to HD, primarily as DVD is 'pretty damned good', and my eyes won't see any further improvement!
Amazon have them at more realistic prices right now, as I write a touch under 14 quid.
There has been great controversy surrounding this release, however, since it has been revealed that the DVDs will feature non-anamorphic versions of the original, unaltered films based on laserdisc releases from 1993 (as opposed to newly-remastered, film-based transfers). Since non-anamorphic transfers fail to make full use of the resolution available on widescreen sets, many fans were upset over this choice.
In response to fan outcry over the perceived mis-treament of the original cuts, Lucasfilm representatives stated that new, anamorphic transfers of the original cuts cannot be made because the original negatives of the theatrical cuts (from which the anamorphic transfers would typically be made) no longer exist. This created further anger when fans worldwide discovered that George Lucas himself had during the 1990s ordered that as many of the existing 35 millimeter copies of the film as could be found be destroyed
In a May 2006 posting, the editor of The Digital Bits, a DVD enthusiast website, noted that one of the supposedly lost 35 millimeter copies is owned by Robert A. Harris, one of the world's renowned film archivists and the owner of Film Preserve, a highly lauded company specializing in the digital transfer and restoration of 35 millimeter film stock. Harris, who is a contributor to the site, submitted a letter stating that he is positive that anamorphic, high definition transfers of the films can be made along with a "master" presentation negative from which new 35 millimeter reels can be made. The letter (a copy of which was sent directly to Lucasfilm) has gone unanswered
There is a piece regarding the quality of the release, on 'The Digital Bits'.
It's been reported previously that when Lucas went back to the original negatives of the Star Wars films in the mid 1990s, they were found to be in bad shape. Such bad shape, in fact, that had they not been restored immediately, the films could have been lost forever. So restoration is exactly what Lucas had done. Except that when he was creating the new 1997 Special Edition versions of the films... he cut the original negatives. So the original negatives of the theatrical versions no longer exist. Okay, we knew that. But what's the big deal? What about the original interpositive prints? What about high-quality release prints? Why can't Lucasfilm just use either of those elements to do a new transfer for DVD?
Well... at the same time as he was preparing the 1997 versions, Lucas apparently went on a little tear and recalled every release print of the theatrical versions that he could get his hands on, and he had them all destroyed. Which means that when Lucas said back in 1997 that the original theatrical versions of the Star Wars films no longer existed, he was serious. He apparently tried hard to make sure of it.
Nonetheless (and thankfully), we know for a FACT that beautiful dye transfer prints of the original versions of the films still exist in private hands, and that additional copies are preserved in a number of film archives around the world. What's more, Lucas would have been foolhardy if he didn't keep the original interpositives carefully stored in a climate-controlled vault for preservation's sake. Come on... of course he did. No one is THAT stupid that they'd just trash all the original elements of the films that made them rich beyond the dreams of avarice.
Bottom line: This notion that Lucasfilm is doing the fans a favor by finally giving them the original versions on DVD in 2006... but in 1993 laserdisc quality... is baloney. In fact, it's unacceptable. Even though most of them probably don't even know what anamorphic means on DVD, or why they should care about it, the fact remains that the fans are getting bilked. We hate to say it, because we've known many of the folks at Lucasfilm for years now. But someone HAS to say it. It needs to be said. Lucasfilm can and should do better. Who knows? Maybe they're already planning to do better for the 30th Anniversary of the original Star Wars next year... and this is just one more bite at the pie in the meantime
I'm thinking '30th anniversary' would be the time when good quality negatives/prints are 'discovered'. Wait much longer and Lucas won't be around to see it... or maybe he dislikes the originals so much that he doesn't want to be around when they get a decent release?
The dilemma... wait for a good transfer (which may never come) or get this inferior transfer?
We've just got back from seeing episode 3. It is the best of the first three films by far - though not perfect by any means. (Warning: Spoilers follow. None that are really major, i.e. nothing that you couldn't guess from watching A New Hope and subsequent films. I've protected them using ROT13. You can decode by using the linked decoder. Cut and paste the paragraphs).
Gur svyz punegf gur snyy bs Nanxva/Evfr bs Inqre. Vg fubjf gur snyy bs gur Wrqv naq gur uvqvat bs Yhxr naq Yrvn (gur uvqvat vf abg gur znva guehfg bs gur svyz gubhtu).
Inqre'f nccrnenapr unccraf dhvgr yngr ba. V gubhtug guvf jbhyq unccra naq jnf abg unccl nobhg vg, V jnagrq zber Inqre. Hasbeghangryl gur nccrnenapr bs Inqre jnf abg unaqyrq nf jryy nf V jbhyq unir ubcrq. Nf Inqre, Nanxva radhverf nsgre Cnqzr, naq fubjf nathvfu jura gbyq fur vf qrnq ol uvf unaq. V haqrefgnaq pbzcyrgryl jul guvf jnf qbar, nsgre nyy, vg jnf Cnqzr gung vzqverpgyl chfurq Nanxva bire gur rqtr - ubjrire gur nathvfu fubhyq unir orra rkcerffrq orsber gur znfx. Bapr Inqre, gur genafsbezngvba fubhyq unir orra pbzcyrgr - gung vf, hagvy Erghea bs gur Wrqv.
V qvq guvax gung Nanxva ghearq n yvggyr gbb rnfvyl. 'Ur arrqf gb fgnaq gevny', lbh pna'g xvyy uvz. Bu, lbh'er qrnq. Lrf, V'yy freir lbh znfgre - xvyy fbzr xvqf? Fher.'
Lbqn jnf cerggl pbby, gnxvat bhg Cnycngvar'f thneqf tbg n ynhtu. Gurer jrer n srj ersreraprf gb gur pheerag jbeyq fvghngvba.
"Lbh'er rvgure jvgu zr, be ntnvafg zr" "Bayl gur Fvgu guvax va fhpu nofbyhgrf"
(be jbeqf gb gung rssrpg)
Erzrzore "Lbh'er rvgure jvgu hf, be jvgu gur greebevfgf"?
Gur ynin frdhrapr jnf whfg gbb BGG sbe zl yvxvat nf jryy. Vg jnf bireqbar naq ybfg oryvrinovyvgl.
Fb, V unir bar zvabe pevgvpvfz nobhg gur beqrevat bs gur riragf, naq V jnfa'g xrra ba gur ynin frdhrapr. V'q unir yvxrq zber Inqre, ohg V pna'g guvax bs ubj guvf jbhyq unir orra qbar va n jnl gung svggrq va.
Overall, a thumbs up.
Today's Astronomy Picture of the Day is striking. However, should I be concerned that I spotted which of the two pictures was Earth without a moment of hesitation? It does make the point quite nicely that Earth is a varied planet and that it is unreasonable to categorise any other planet from one or two shots (Ice Planet Hoth or Forest Moon of Endor, anyone?).
Stargate SG1 once showed this very well by having Carter and O'Neill wind up in Antarctica, and Carter reports back 'Colonel? It's an ice planet. That's all there is as far as the eye can see. No chance.'. (Season 9 of SG1 is now filming).