Six Nations 2010 – Match 11 – Scotland vs. England

The annual Calcutta Cup Match takes place between England and Scotland each year. Its name originates from the end of the 19th century when the Calcutta (Rugby) Football club was forced to close in 1878 due to a lack of new blood, the departure of an English regiment from the area and the rise in popularity of polo (source)

The club withdrew their remaining 270 silver rupee coins from the bank, had them melted down and made a cup, which they donated to the RFU in England for it to be used as the union saw fit for ‘the best means of doing some lasting good for the cause of Rugby Football’.

The RFU were unwilling to promote a club competition for fear of introducing professionalism to the amateur game, and so it became the totem for the match between England and Scotland.

England took the cup from Scotland in 2009. Since 2005 it has changed hands every year, with the home side taking it.

This year, the match was played at Murrayfield, and Scotland opened the scoring, kicking a penalty to lead 3-0.

Wirhin a couple of minutes, Scotland had another penalty but missed touch and Cueto cleared. With ten minutes played, the ball came from the scrum and found Ugo Monye on the far side of the field. The ball came back across, and a poor pass from Johnny Wilkinson to Dylan Hartley went into touch.

At 15 minutes, Johnny Wilkinson kicked a penalty to the sound of some very unsporting boos and whistles. This is not good form, after all, it’s not soccer. I’m not just saying that as England was on the receiving end, I feel the same on those occasions that we hear booing at Twickenham.

Scotland responded with pressure on England, and there was a sustained period of play metres from the English line. England conceded a penalty and Dan Parks kicked it over. 6-3 Scotland.

At the 30th minute England was awarded a penalty, which Wilkinson kicked over. There was a bit of a tiff between Dylan Hartley and a Scottish player (didn’t see who) at this point, just before the penalty kick. The Scot had grabbed Hartley’s head, and Hartley lashed out. This resulted in a talking-to. 6-all.

In the 36th minute, Scotland put together a threatening attacking sequence. This broke down and we had a lengthy scrum with multiple collapses. It took almost three minutes for the ball to come out of the scrum, and even then that scrum collapsed as the ball left.

Just before half time, Dan Parks kicked a drop goal, 9-6.

England did get the restart and rather frustratingly kicked away possession after the clock went red.

In the second half, Scotland began by conceding a penalty, which was duly converted. The scores were level on 9-all.

Wilkinson went in for a tackle, he bounced right off and bashed his head. He spent quite some time on the floor. The tannoy announced that Wilkinson would be subbed and a cheer went up. It sounded to me like a small group relatively near a microphone, but that was not a worthy reaction. In rugby the opposition is shown respect (until they do something to lose it). The reaction of the majority, the appreciative applause was much more in keeping with the spirit of things. Of course, it may have been that the cheer was for the arrival of Flood and not the departure of Wilkinson, but that wasn’t how it seemed to me.

Within a couple of minutes Toby Flood had his first penalty kick, successful. 9-12.

James Haskell conceded a penalty almost immediately, not releasing the tackled player. This time the English spectators were unsporting to the kicker. An annoying trend. 12-all at 52 mins.

Scotland had a good sequence of attack, and metres from the line Brown clashed heads with Ugo Monye. Brown walked off, but Ugo Monye went off on a stretcher wearing a neck brace. He got the customary applause as he went off.

In the 60th minute, England were in posession at the Scottish end, the scrum went down again and again, but after a few attempt Easter got the ball out just before the posts. England gained advantage and passed the ball wide to attempt the try. Losing posession the play was brought back for the penalty. Flood kicked the ball over to a chorus of whistles. 12-15.

England almost immediately conceded a penalty, narrowly escaping a yellow card. Dan Parks’ kick went short, but Scotland chased and threatened a try. This came to nothing, but England conceded another penalty which was kicked over. With a little over ten minutes left it was even-stevens at 15-all.

Scotland seemed to find a new spur at this point, and looked really dangerous. England were on the back foot. England contained the attack with eight minutes to go, but the response was not quick-ball, it seemed rather ponderous in comparison to the previous Scottish play.

With four minutes to go, what was the best couple of minutes for both sides, Scotland conceded a penalty for holding back a player. Toby Flood, kicking to a whistling crowd, just misjudged and the score remained 15-all.

Scotland came back with a dangerous looking run down the wing, fortunately for England he was brought down and he knocked on in the process. England had the scrum, and collapse after collapse saw the clock go red. There were far, far too many collapsed scrums in this game – the referee didn’t do well in this regard.

England drove the ball forward and Toby Flood went for a drop goal. It wasn’t to be. Scotland gained possession and kicked to touch. 15-all. The Calcutta Cup remains with the team who last won it, in this case, England.

Team P W D L F A PTS
1 France 3 3 0 0 77 39 6
2 Ireland 4 3 0 1 86 72 6
3 England 4 2 1 1 78 64 5
4 Italy 3 1 0 2 39 58 2
5 Wales 4 1 0 3 80 107 2
6 Scotland 4 0 1 3 60 80 1
Table Built: Saturday, 13 March 2010 19:00 UK

This post is the latest in a series of 14 posts which begins with Six Nations 2010 - Opening weekend.

  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg This Post
  • Stumble This Post
  • RSS Feed
Posted in Sport | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Six Nations 2010 – Match 10 – Ireland vs. Wales

After a slowish start, the first points of the game came at roughly ten minutes from the boot of Stephen Jones. In what I thought was a harsh decision for Ireland, Wales were awarded a penalty for the tackler not rolling away.

Jonathan Sexton kicked a penalty for Ireland eight minutes later to equalise at 3-all, in the interim Wales had missed an opportunity to go six ahead.

Just after the 21st minute the first really lovely bit of play made an appearance, an inside pass to Tommy Bowe saw him running away with the ball. Wales stopped the attack but as Ireland had advantage it went back for a penalty which Sexton duly kicked to take Ireland 6-3 ahead.

Wales went a man down, and Ireland responded with an attack. The attack stopped metres from the line, but Wales conceded a penalty in the process. Ireland took a quick penalty and Keith Earls rolled over the line to score.

Sexton did not convert, the ball bounced off the posts.

Soon after, Tomas O’Leary collected the offload from a tackled player, he ran clear to be tackled by Halfpenny as he approached the line. Sexton failed to convert, this time kicking wide.

With 36 minutes on the clock, Lee Byrne returned. The score was now 16-3.

Wales went on the attack, they looked like they’d score a try, but were held up just before the line. Wales did win a penalty, though, and so the score reached 16-6.

Within the first ten minutes of the second half, Wales went on the attack, and we had a series of scrums just metres from a Welsh try. Ireland held on and prevented the Welsh from scoring.

Within minutes the Welsh conceded a soft penalty due to throwing the ball away after it had been carried to touch. Throwing the ball like that being equivalent to killing the ball. Jonathan Sexton kicked the penalty, bringing the score to 19-6.

David Wallace soon gave away a penalty for not releasing the tackled player. Stephen Jones kicked it over scoring the first Welsh points of the half. 19-9 to Ireland.

Halfway in the second half, Tomas O’Leary made a break and drew in lots of Welsh players. He offloaded to Keith Earls who again was tackled on the line and rolled in to score. Sexton failed to convert, and so the score became 24-9. A penalty for Wales took the score to 24-12.

With eight minutes to go, Stephen Jones kicked to touch deep into Ireland’s side – but no advantage was gained, they conceded a penalty and Wales got it clear.

With four minutes to go, Ireland were on the attack and after a good run of play Jonathan Sexton kicked a drop goal to bring the score to 27-12, beyond the reach of Wales.

Wales would have to score two converted tries and a kick. This would have been difficult in the time remaining even if Ireland had gone to the showers early.

As the clock went red, Ireland had the ball in hand, but Hook passed the ball into touch ending the game.

Ireland 27, Wales 12.

Team P W D L F A PTS
1 France 3 3 0 0 77 39 6
2 Ireland 4 3 0 1 86 72 6
3 England 3 2 0 1 63 49 4
4 Italy 3 1 0 2 39 58 2
5 Wales 4 1 0 3 80 107 2
6 Scotland 3 0 0 3 45 65 0
Table Built: Saturday, 13 March 2010 16:25 UK

This post is part of a series of 14 posts which begins with Six Nations 2010 - Opening weekend, the latest post in the series is Six Nations 2010 - Match 11 - Scotland vs. England.

  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg This Post
  • Stumble This Post
  • RSS Feed
Posted in Sport | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paris Nice 2010 – Stage 4 Results

The fourth stage of the Paris-Nice ended with a gruelling time and a mountain-top finish. Alberto Contador put in a magnificent effort overhauling Jens Voigt by some 44 seconds to take the yellow jersey.

His climb up to Mende was superb, putting clear tarmac between him and the strung out group of riders following.

Contador claims the yellow jersey, with Peter Sagan keeping green but losing white to Roman Kreuziger. Laurent Mangel retains the polkadot jersey.
Read More »

This post is part of a series of 9 posts which begins with Paris-Nice 2010 Prologue, the latest post in the series is Paris Nice 2010 - Stage 7 Results.

  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg This Post
  • Stumble This Post
  • RSS Feed
Posted in Sport | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Paris-Nice Stage 3 results

Due to snow at the start line, the stage start was moved to St. Yrieix-la-Perche, and the ride to Aurillac was 153km. The yellow jersey moved to a new back in the Paris-Nice, as Lars Boom came in 79th, losing 27 seconds on the stage winner. Jens Voigt lost only two seconds – thus Jens Voigt gained 20 seconds on Lars Boom to take the lead in the general classification.

During the race, the lead group opened a lead of over 5 minutes, but with tens of kilometres to play with, the peloton reigned them in, bringing it down to 105 seconds at the 35km mark. At 25km to go, the gap seemed to steady at about 75 seconds, and at 20km it increased to about 90 seconds.

With 12km to go, the gap was under a minute. A good rule of thumb is that to keep clear of the more efficient peloton, a breakaway group needs about a minute for 10km. This would be close. Within 5 minutes, the gap would be about 20 seconds, and with 5.5km, the breakaway of Huguets and Roelandts was absorbed.

Peter Sagan not only won the stage in a final sprint at the end of a big climb. He also took the green jersey.

Liquigas takes the lead in the team competition, nine seconds ahead of Radioshack.

The next stage is in the mountains and heads east to Mende, with a category 1 climb to the finish.

Read More »

This post is part of a series of 9 posts which begins with Paris-Nice 2010 Prologue, the latest post in the series is Paris Nice 2010 - Stage 7 Results.

  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg This Post
  • Stumble This Post
  • RSS Feed
Posted in Sport | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A200 – Block 1 is ending

I’m now a month into (officially) A200: Exploring History, Medieval to Modern. Unofficially, I’m about six weeks in – 3 months in if you count reading ‘Wallace’.

Having initially been ahead of schedule, after one block I am bang on schedule. This is slightly worrying as it implies that I will soon be behind schedule.

Next week, the task is to write the TMA, the tutor marked assessment. Fortunately, I am already half way there, so I’m hoping to be able to rebuild a little slack into the system by pressing ahead with block 2 (due to start on the 20th march).

The course has been interesting, but very involved. I’m not a historian and it’s tricky separating the ‘interesting’ from the ‘important’. When is a detail vital, when is it just ‘colour’? Obviously, each and every detail is important for some later study, but until you get ‘later’ you can’t tell which you need – so I’m finding it tough when reading something for the first time to pick out the key points.

Having said that, if I re-read something, it gets easier as I have a framework in place and I’m not operating from a position of total ignorance.

The four units in module 1 to date are:

  1. When England ruled France (i.e. Charles VI of France and Henry V of England giving way to Henry VI having a claim on the French throne, and Charles VII not liking this one bit.
  2. Power and Consumption (i.e. The dukes of Burgundy – and Burgundy as a power in its own right)
  3. English Society in the later middle ages (the end of the French Wars leading into the Wars of the Roses
  4. Belief and Religion in Burgundy, England and France

The latter is the topic I’m looking at now. I’m about as irreligious a person as you could meet – I don’t understand the mindset, especially when history shows us that religions change – but I cannot deny that religion has an important place in the history of the world.

The unit primarily looks at Catholicism and we see how that came about from humble beginnings – and how it mutated over time, with purgatory, satan and even ideas of the trinity being ‘bolt on’ additions. It also looks at the religious neighbours – the Greek Orthodox Church (which came about due to the Roman empire splitting into East and West, with the eastern empire surviving as Byzantium), and it looks at Islam, the incredible rise of the Moslem Empire which went from being in the Arabian peninsula at the death of the Prophet to spanning a huge area in about eighty years – reaching from Asia to the Atlantic coast of Africa, as well as gaining a European foothold. Granada was the last European vestige of this empire in 1492 (Christopher Columbus saw the surrender).

The unit also looks at the Great Schism, where for a time there were three Popes, the third being created to try and unify the two factions.

It’s all interesting stuff – obviously as the course focusses on European history and so Catholicism is central. I’m loving the politics and intrigue of it all – and am struggling with the religion itself – I’m simply unfamiliar with a lot of the terms. Fortunately that doesn’t matter too much as I’m picking it up as I go.

What I’m finding interesting is the thought that despite the historical evidence that much of the church is man-made, often the result of a debate or decree, people still take things at face value. I suppose, this was the point of the reformers like Calvin and Luther, going back to scripture as the Catholic church had ‘distorted’ Christianity.

For the assignment, I have to focus on unit 3 (it’s tempting to skip unit 4 – but I don’t want to!) – the assignment is to write a short piece about a painting showing the Trial of the Duke of Alençon in 15th century France, as well as a short piece on a document, a letter to William Stonor written in England in 1476. I’ve done the writing about the painting, I need to draft the piece about the letter – and then I need to edit both pieces to form a complete response. It should be fine.

This post is the latest in a series of 3 posts which begins with A200 - A new course.

  • Add to Delicious
  • Digg This Post
  • Stumble This Post
  • RSS Feed
Posted in Open University | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Recent Comments