<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton&#8217;s &#8216;Elitism versus Everyman&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murky.org/blg/clintons-elitism-versus-everyman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murky.org/blg/clintons-elitism-versus-everyman/</link>
	<description>Tending to Geekiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:45:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Murk</title>
		<link>http://www.murky.org/blg/clintons-elitism-versus-everyman/#comment-45798</link>
		<dc:creator>Murk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murky.org/blg/?p=1611#comment-45798</guid>
		<description>Quite. I&#039;d really like it if people would recognise that it&#039;d really be quite good to have someone with a brain in the oval office, not someone who will pander to the lowest common denominator (even if the voter in question IS the lowest common denominator).

Yes, I know that pandering to the lowest common denominator and having a brain aren&#039;t mutually exclusive, but why shouldn&#039;t the person aiming for the highest public office seek to show that they have a brain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite. I&#8217;d really like it if people would recognise that it&#8217;d really be quite good to have someone with a brain in the oval office, not someone who will pander to the lowest common denominator (even if the voter in question IS the lowest common denominator).</p>
<p>Yes, I know that pandering to the lowest common denominator and having a brain aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive, but why shouldn&#8217;t the person aiming for the highest public office seek to show that they have a brain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovable liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.murky.org/blg/clintons-elitism-versus-everyman/#comment-45797</link>
		<dc:creator>lovable liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murky.org/blg/?p=1611#comment-45797</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always skeptical of hundred-millionaires hectoring a mere millionaire (and barely) about elitism, especially since the hectoree wasn&#039;t born into affluence.  They could conceivably be right, but they&#039;re usually full of it.

What&#039;s even more troubling is the message sent by those who then buy the message and vote accordingly.  They&#039;re saying, &quot;Treat me as if I&#039;m stupid - because by God I&#039;m proud to be just that.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always skeptical of hundred-millionaires hectoring a mere millionaire (and barely) about elitism, especially since the hectoree wasn&#8217;t born into affluence.  They could conceivably be right, but they&#8217;re usually full of it.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more troubling is the message sent by those who then buy the message and vote accordingly.  They&#8217;re saying, &#8220;Treat me as if I&#8217;m stupid &#8211; because by God I&#8217;m proud to be just that.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
